Hold Period — Cities of Massachusetts
Cities of Massachusetts ranked by average flip hold-period.
Fastest-flip states (shortest avg hold)
Longest-hold states
City ranking — Massachusetts (avg hold period)
Cities in Massachusetts (sample ≥ 20 flips)
Sorted shortest to longest| # | City | Avg hold (yrs) | Avg hold (mo) | Avg gain % | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Malden | 0.79 | 9.6 | +63.7% | 26 |
| 2 | Billerica | 0.81 | 9.8 | +89.4% | 37 |
| 3 | Westfield | 0.82 | 10.0 | +78.9% | 38 |
| 4 | Beverly | 0.83 | 10.1 | +56.0% | 33 |
| 5 | Ludlow | 0.83 | 10.2 | +87.3% | 26 |
| 6 | Pembroke | 0.83 | 10.2 | +96.0% | 20 |
| 7 | Attleboro | 0.84 | 10.2 | +72.1% | 50 |
| 8 | Holyoke | 0.85 | 10.3 | +83.4% | 34 |
| 9 | Lowell | 0.85 | 10.3 | +59.7% | 55 |
| 10 | Wilmington | 0.85 | 10.4 | +104.6% | 25 |
| 11 | Bellingham | 0.86 | 10.4 | +81.8% | 25 |
| 12 | North Andover | 0.88 | 10.7 | +65.8% | 37 |
| 13 | Randolph | 0.88 | 10.8 | +64.8% | 29 |
| 14 | Longmeadow | 0.89 | 10.8 | +77.6% | 25 |
| 15 | Springfield | 0.90 | 11.0 | +98.8% | 144 |
| 16 | Peabody | 0.91 | 11.1 | +66.9% | 24 |
| 17 | Revere | 0.92 | 11.2 | +66.7% | 27 |
| 18 | Brockton | 0.93 | 11.3 | +73.7% | 70 |
| 19 | Dracut | 0.93 | 11.3 | +68.4% | 32 |
| 20 | Agawam | 0.93 | 11.4 | +67.2% | 34 |
| 21 | West Springfield | 0.94 | 11.4 | +79.3% | 22 |
| 22 | Leominster | 0.95 | 11.6 | +74.1% | 43 |
| 23 | Fall River | 0.97 | 11.8 | +90.1% | 78 |
| 24 | Waltham | 0.97 | 11.8 | +87.9% | 25 |
| 25 | Holliston | 0.97 | 11.8 | +78.4% | 21 |
| 26 | Stoughton | 0.97 | 11.8 | +97.7% | 33 |
| 27 | Weymouth | 0.98 | 12.0 | +67.4% | 56 |
| 28 | Swansea | 0.98 | 11.9 | +66.8% | 24 |
| 29 | Dennis Port | 0.98 | 12.0 | +71.0% | 20 |
| 30 | Lynn | 0.98 | 11.9 | +58.8% | 54 |
| 31 | Oxford | 0.98 | 11.9 | +101.3% | 26 |
| 32 | Haverhill | 0.99 | 12.0 | +61.0% | 54 |
| 33 | Taunton | 0.99 | 12.1 | +68.4% | 64 |
| 34 | Auburn | 1.00 | 12.2 | +100.1% | 32 |
| 35 | Gardner | 1.00 | 12.2 | +89.3% | 34 |
| 36 | Seekonk | 1.00 | 12.2 | +89.6% | 26 |
| 37 | Medford | 1.00 | 12.1 | +68.1% | 24 |
| 38 | Boston | 1.01 | 12.2 | +64.8% | 151 |
| 39 | Methuen | 1.01 | 12.3 | +83.0% | 39 |
| 40 | New Bedford | 1.02 | 12.4 | +74.3% | 119 |
| 41 | Chelmsford | 1.03 | 12.6 | +56.3% | 22 |
| 42 | Chicopee | 1.03 | 12.6 | +95.7% | 58 |
| 43 | East Falmouth | 1.03 | 12.6 | +156.1% | 21 |
| 44 | Worcester | 1.04 | 12.7 | +80.1% | 96 |
| 45 | Framingham | 1.04 | 12.6 | +81.7% | 33 |
| 46 | Melrose | 1.04 | 12.6 | +52.3% | 20 |
| 47 | North Attleboro | 1.05 | 12.8 | +66.0% | 28 |
| 48 | Quincy | 1.05 | 12.8 | +54.5% | 27 |
| 49 | Wareham | 1.06 | 12.9 | +77.3% | 41 |
| 50 | Shrewsbury | 1.06 | 12.9 | +73.1% | 33 |
What hold period tells investors
Short average holds (under 2 years) indicate a liquid market — properties trade often, exit timing is flexible, and capital recycles quickly. Long holds (5+ years) suggest fewer buyers, slower exits, and higher carry-cost risk.
Markets where typical investors hold 3–9 months are dominated by fix-and-flip operators. Markets averaging 5–10 years are dominated by buy-and-hold landlords. Choose the strategy that matches the market — don't fight it.
This metric reflects only properties that resold. True buy-and-hold landlords who never sold during the data window are invisible here. Treat the numbers as a relative ranking across states, not an absolute hold-period truth. Source: public record.