Hold Period — Cities of New Hampshire
Cities of New Hampshire ranked by average flip hold-period.
Fastest-flip states (shortest avg hold)
Longest-hold states
City ranking — New Hampshire (avg hold period)
Cities in New Hampshire (sample ≥ 20 flips)
Sorted shortest to longest| # | City | Avg hold (yrs) | Avg hold (mo) | Avg gain % | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raymond | 0.77 | 9.4 | +110.3% | 23 |
| 2 | Franklin | 0.81 | 9.9 | +175.6% | 20 |
| 3 | Hudson | 0.82 | 10.0 | +63.3% | 26 |
| 4 | Salem | 0.87 | 10.6 | +122.4% | 36 |
| 5 | Nashua | 0.92 | 11.2 | +52.2% | 62 |
| 6 | Manchester | 0.94 | 11.5 | +71.2% | 101 |
| 7 | Merrimack | 0.95 | 11.6 | +84.1% | 37 |
| 8 | Belmont | 0.97 | 11.9 | +161.5% | 30 |
| 9 | Claremont | 1.00 | 12.2 | +90.2% | 38 |
| 10 | Amherst | 1.04 | 12.7 | +155.7% | 20 |
| 11 | Somersworth | 1.05 | 12.7 | +80.2% | 28 |
| 12 | Laconia | 1.07 | 13.0 | +130.5% | 74 |
| 13 | Dover | 1.08 | 13.1 | +97.4% | 57 |
| 14 | Rochester | 1.08 | 13.2 | +147.7% | 74 |
| 15 | Bedford | 1.09 | 13.3 | +75.3% | 24 |
| 16 | Londonderry | 1.09 | 13.3 | +76.7% | 30 |
| 17 | Windham | 1.09 | 13.3 | +217.1% | 28 |
| 18 | Hooksett | 1.11 | 13.5 | +53.5% | 20 |
| 19 | Concord | 1.12 | 13.6 | +101.2% | 78 |
| 20 | Barnstead | 1.12 | 13.6 | +170.8% | 25 |
| 21 | Meredith | 1.13 | 13.7 | +108.9% | 23 |
| 22 | Keene | 1.17 | 14.2 | +109.7% | 27 |
| 23 | Gilford | 1.19 | 14.5 | +194.2% | 32 |
| 24 | Portsmouth | 1.19 | 14.5 | +115.2% | 40 |
| 25 | Derry | 1.21 | 14.7 | +89.8% | 37 |
| 26 | Berlin | 1.33 | 16.2 | +85.8% | 33 |
What hold period tells investors
Short average holds (under 2 years) indicate a liquid market — properties trade often, exit timing is flexible, and capital recycles quickly. Long holds (5+ years) suggest fewer buyers, slower exits, and higher carry-cost risk.
Markets where typical investors hold 3–9 months are dominated by fix-and-flip operators. Markets averaging 5–10 years are dominated by buy-and-hold landlords. Choose the strategy that matches the market — don't fight it.
This metric reflects only properties that resold. True buy-and-hold landlords who never sold during the data window are invisible here. Treat the numbers as a relative ranking across states, not an absolute hold-period truth. Source: public record.