Hold Period — Cities of North Carolina
Cities of North Carolina ranked by average flip hold-period.
Fastest-flip states (shortest avg hold)
Longest-hold states
City ranking — North Carolina (avg hold period)
Cities in North Carolina (sample ≥ 20 flips)
Sorted shortest to longest| # | City | Avg hold (yrs) | Avg hold (mo) | Avg gain % | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norwood | 0.42 | 5.1 | +79.3% | 85 |
| 2 | La Grange | 0.44 | 5.4 | +86.4% | 33 |
| 3 | Stedman | 0.62 | 7.5 | +249.7% | 22 |
| 4 | Mount Holly | 0.66 | 8.0 | +154.2% | 113 |
| 5 | Gibsonville | 0.70 | 8.5 | +144.0% | 69 |
| 6 | Midland | 0.70 | 8.6 | +108.0% | 43 |
| 7 | Tarboro | 0.70 | 8.5 | +99.7% | 91 |
| 8 | Spencer | 0.70 | 8.5 | +187.1% | 43 |
| 9 | Autryville | 0.71 | 8.7 | +275.8% | 26 |
| 10 | Sophia | 0.71 | 8.6 | +164.5% | 25 |
| 11 | Landis | 0.71 | 8.7 | +243.8% | 35 |
| 12 | Nashville | 0.72 | 8.8 | +166.2% | 49 |
| 13 | Burlington | 0.73 | 8.9 | +154.5% | 199 |
| 14 | Troutman | 0.74 | 9.0 | +174.2% | 95 |
| 15 | Moyock | 0.76 | 9.3 | +228.5% | 115 |
| 16 | Roxboro | 0.78 | 9.5 | +200.5% | 83 |
| 17 | Maysville | 0.78 | 9.4 | +198.8% | 97 |
| 18 | Mooresboro | 0.79 | 9.6 | +138.7% | 22 |
| 19 | Lumberton | 0.80 | 9.8 | +188.6% | 73 |
| 20 | Beulaville | 0.80 | 9.8 | +122.4% | 62 |
| 21 | Thomasville | 0.80 | 9.7 | +127.6% | 173 |
| 22 | Broadway | 0.80 | 9.8 | +170.9% | 59 |
| 23 | Kings Mountain | 0.80 | 9.8 | +181.4% | 111 |
| 24 | Ramseur | 0.80 | 9.7 | +158.0% | 20 |
| 25 | Rocky Mount | 0.81 | 9.9 | +178.7% | 222 |
| 26 | Monroe | 0.81 | 9.8 | +160.7% | 269 |
| 27 | Claremont | 0.81 | 9.9 | +137.1% | 24 |
| 28 | Winston Salem | 0.81 | 9.9 | +182.6% | 438 |
| 29 | Salisbury | 0.82 | 10.0 | +170.9% | 281 |
| 30 | Bailey | 0.83 | 10.0 | +280.3% | 47 |
| 31 | Bessemer City | 0.83 | 10.1 | +191.5% | 82 |
| 32 | Cameron | 0.83 | 10.1 | +201.5% | 129 |
| 33 | Kenly | 0.83 | 10.2 | +304.3% | 31 |
| 34 | Sims | 0.84 | 10.2 | +186.1% | 27 |
| 35 | Graham | 0.84 | 10.2 | +202.8% | 96 |
| 36 | Stanley | 0.84 | 10.2 | +168.9% | 68 |
| 37 | Mount Airy | 0.84 | 10.2 | +103.0% | 97 |
| 38 | Valdese | 0.84 | 10.3 | +169.0% | 33 |
| 39 | Kannapolis | 0.84 | 10.3 | +133.2% | 226 |
| 40 | Elizabeth City | 0.84 | 10.2 | +196.3% | 161 |
| 41 | Erwin | 0.84 | 10.3 | +162.7% | 58 |
| 42 | Sylva | 0.85 | 10.3 | +111.5% | 52 |
| 43 | Coats | 0.85 | 10.3 | +224.9% | 29 |
| 44 | Tabor City | 0.85 | 10.3 | +158.1% | 33 |
| 45 | Pilot Mountain | 0.85 | 10.4 | +165.2% | 21 |
| 46 | Henderson | 0.85 | 10.3 | +179.5% | 63 |
| 47 | Warrenton | 0.85 | 10.3 | +130.6% | 25 |
| 48 | Raeford | 0.85 | 10.4 | +147.7% | 219 |
| 49 | Gastonia | 0.85 | 10.3 | +148.3% | 381 |
| 50 | China Grove | 0.86 | 10.5 | +156.2% | 76 |
What hold period tells investors
Short average holds (under 2 years) indicate a liquid market — properties trade often, exit timing is flexible, and capital recycles quickly. Long holds (5+ years) suggest fewer buyers, slower exits, and higher carry-cost risk.
Markets where typical investors hold 3–9 months are dominated by fix-and-flip operators. Markets averaging 5–10 years are dominated by buy-and-hold landlords. Choose the strategy that matches the market — don't fight it.
This metric reflects only properties that resold. True buy-and-hold landlords who never sold during the data window are invisible here. Treat the numbers as a relative ranking across states, not an absolute hold-period truth. Source: public record.