Hold Period — Cities of South Carolina
Cities of South Carolina ranked by average flip hold-period.
Fastest-flip states (shortest avg hold)
Longest-hold states
City ranking — South Carolina (avg hold period)
Cities in South Carolina (sample ≥ 20 flips)
Sorted shortest to longest| # | City | Avg hold (yrs) | Avg hold (mo) | Avg gain % | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winnsboro | 0.49 | 5.9 | +86.3% | 38 |
| 2 | Warrenville | 0.59 | 7.2 | +306.0% | 37 |
| 3 | Beech Island | 0.66 | 8.0 | +401.2% | 79 |
| 4 | Lyman | 0.66 | 8.0 | +126.1% | 168 |
| 5 | Pendleton | 0.67 | 8.2 | +258.9% | 69 |
| 6 | Chesnee | 0.67 | 8.1 | +254.5% | 146 |
| 7 | Roebuck | 0.67 | 8.1 | +171.0% | 57 |
| 8 | Gaston | 0.67 | 8.1 | +127.5% | 28 |
| 9 | Wagener | 0.68 | 8.3 | +78.1% | 24 |
| 10 | Walhalla | 0.70 | 8.5 | +387.7% | 56 |
| 11 | Woodruff | 0.71 | 8.6 | +132.0% | 214 |
| 12 | Belton | 0.73 | 8.9 | +180.8% | 140 |
| 13 | Irmo | 0.73 | 8.9 | +85.4% | 81 |
| 14 | Boiling Springs | 0.75 | 9.1 | +121.0% | 285 |
| 15 | Moore | 0.77 | 9.4 | +175.1% | 87 |
| 16 | Pelzer | 0.78 | 9.5 | +153.6% | 69 |
| 17 | Batesburg | 0.79 | 9.6 | +106.9% | 25 |
| 18 | Inman | 0.79 | 9.7 | +186.2% | 162 |
| 19 | Wellford | 0.80 | 9.7 | +248.9% | 71 |
| 20 | Gaffney | 0.80 | 9.7 | +217.0% | 129 |
| 21 | Graniteville | 0.81 | 9.9 | +280.0% | 117 |
| 22 | Hopkins | 0.81 | 9.8 | +120.1% | 20 |
| 23 | Easley | 0.81 | 9.9 | +146.5% | 274 |
| 24 | Piedmont | 0.81 | 9.9 | +164.7% | 146 |
| 25 | Galivants Ferry | 0.81 | 9.9 | +276.1% | 30 |
| 26 | Aynor | 0.82 | 10.0 | +198.8% | 24 |
| 27 | Pacolet | 0.82 | 9.9 | +211.4% | 21 |
| 28 | Port Royal | 0.83 | 10.1 | +163.1% | 30 |
| 29 | North Augusta | 0.84 | 10.2 | +233.0% | 327 |
| 30 | Laurens | 0.84 | 10.3 | +162.3% | 86 |
| 31 | Central | 0.84 | 10.2 | +121.4% | 32 |
| 32 | Fountain Inn | 0.84 | 10.2 | +117.9% | 69 |
| 33 | Campobello | 0.85 | 10.4 | +214.1% | 90 |
| 34 | Spartanburg | 0.85 | 10.3 | +125.7% | 439 |
| 35 | North Charleston | 0.85 | 10.3 | +111.8% | 253 |
| 36 | Aiken | 0.85 | 10.4 | +199.7% | 499 |
| 37 | Dalzell | 0.86 | 10.4 | +253.8% | 66 |
| 38 | Darlington | 0.86 | 10.4 | +168.6% | 27 |
| 39 | Pickens | 0.86 | 10.4 | +154.4% | 58 |
| 40 | West Union | 0.86 | 10.5 | +197.3% | 34 |
| 41 | West Columbia | 0.87 | 10.5 | +113.0% | 83 |
| 42 | Camden | 0.88 | 10.7 | +118.7% | 39 |
| 43 | Taylors | 0.89 | 10.8 | +182.1% | 167 |
| 44 | Columbia | 0.89 | 10.8 | +96.4% | 484 |
| 45 | Marietta | 0.89 | 10.9 | +294.1% | 51 |
| 46 | Clinton | 0.89 | 10.8 | +156.3% | 57 |
| 47 | Orangeburg | 0.89 | 10.8 | +258.0% | 59 |
| 48 | Cowpens | 0.89 | 10.9 | +214.0% | 31 |
| 49 | Saint Stephen | 0.90 | 10.9 | +293.9% | 20 |
| 50 | Iva | 0.90 | 10.9 | +200.3% | 21 |
What hold period tells investors
Short average holds (under 2 years) indicate a liquid market — properties trade often, exit timing is flexible, and capital recycles quickly. Long holds (5+ years) suggest fewer buyers, slower exits, and higher carry-cost risk.
Markets where typical investors hold 3–9 months are dominated by fix-and-flip operators. Markets averaging 5–10 years are dominated by buy-and-hold landlords. Choose the strategy that matches the market — don't fight it.
This metric reflects only properties that resold. True buy-and-hold landlords who never sold during the data window are invisible here. Treat the numbers as a relative ranking across states, not an absolute hold-period truth. Source: public record.