60 100
Richfield, UT 84701
3 ba 2,268 sqft Built 1973 Lot 30,928 sqft single_family
No recorded sales
Location
Timeline: Sale, Listing & Tax History
Recorded events
No recorded events
No sale or listing events are on file for this property.
Tax assessment history
| Year | Building | Land | Total assessed | Tax paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $136,036 | $42,083 | $178,119 | $1,443 |
| 2024 | $136,036 | $42,083 | $178,119 | $1,618 |
| 2023 | $126,557 | $23,307 | $149,864 | $1,270 |
| 2022 | $89,572 | $22,505 | $112,077 | $1,069 |
| 2021 | $77,034 | $11,563 | $88,597 | $1,015 |
| 2020 | $78,968 | $9,636 | $88,604 | $1,077 |
| 2019 | $56,240 | $9,640 | $65,880 | $750 |
| 2018 | $53,330 | $9,640 | $62,970 | $803 |
| 2017 | $46,590 | $8,830 | $55,420 | $739 |
| 2015 | $46,590 | $8,830 | $55,420 | $617 |
| 2014 | $46,590 | $8,830 | $55,420 | $603 |
| 2012 | $46,590 | $8,830 | $55,420 | $571 |
| 2011 | $41,220 | $8,770 | $49,990 | $495 |
| 2009 | $41,220 | $8,770 | $49,990 | $494 |
| 2005 | $41,220 | $8,770 | $49,990 | $480 |
Property facts
Year built
1973
Property type
single_family
Stories
1
Beds
—
Baths
3
Living area
2,268 sqft
Lot size
30,928 sqft
ZIP code
84701
City
Richfield
Street
100
Coordinates
38.51106, -111.87868
Comparable properties nearby
Block-level micro-comps
Same street, ±3 house numbers, sold in the last 24 monthsFrequently asked questions
When did 60 100 last sell?
No public-record sale is on file for 60 100.
What is the current tax assessment for 60 100?
The most recent total assessment for 60 100 (year 2025) is $178,119 with $1,443 in property tax.
When was 60 100 built?
60 100 was built in 1973.
How does 60 100 compare to others on 100?
We track 8 other properties on 100. Browse the list under "Other properties on 100" to compare beds, baths, and sale history.
What are the property facts for 60 100?
60 100 is a 3 bath, 2,268 sqft, 30,928 sqft lot single_family.
Is 60 100 a flip candidate?
No — 60 100 does not appear in our flips dataset.
Is 60 100 a tax-appeal candidate?
No — 60 100 is not currently flagged as a tax-appeal candidate.